Speaking green in a red state
I had been toying with the idea of this blog post for a long time. For the life of me, I can’t understand why environmentalists are spending so much energy trying to convince people that climate change is happening when it’s far easier to get them to make climate-friendly choices through other means.
But most of what I would have said was already being done by the Climate and Energy Project (CEP) as told in this New York Times article: In Kansas, Climate Skeptics Embrace Cleaner Energy. The article by Leslie Kaufman is part of the Times’ series Beyond Fossil Fuels.
A year-long competition sponsored by CEP convinced Kansans to cut energy use by focusing on thrift, patriotism, spiritual conviction and economic prosperity rather than regulating greenhouse gases.
It’s a fascinating article. As CEP said in response on their blog:
And as the nation’s leaders continue to struggle to find modes and models for energy reform… Hellooooooo………
This is a topic I’d like to spend a lot more time on. What do you think? Can we make more progress on the environment by not talking about climate change?


2 Comments:
As Big Green Head says, Do Green-It's not just for tree huggers anymore (www.biggreenhead.com) The reason? Because if you start getting all "sciencey" about going green, you run the risk of being pigeonholed as a radical hippie and your ideas may be dismissed. People want to hear how going green effects their wallet and their family. Love the post. An interesting topic!
What a brilliant idea. As any engineer knows, efficiency is appealing because, well, it's right. Despite the wastefulness that real or imagined prosperity has brought to our culture, thrift and elegance in design are ingrained in the American value system.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home