Monday, October 25, 2010

This week in Green Communications & PR

Every week I Tweet and share dozens of links to content on green advertising, media, communications and public relations. If you want those links in real time, just follow me on Twitter and/or subscribe to my shared items on Google Reader.

The big news from this week was the launch of the two Chevron ad campaigns: the one from Chevron and the one from The Yes Men. Here are the links from the past week:

Advertising:

Are U.K.'s Yeo Valley Rapping Farmers Better Than 'X Factor' Contestants?

Big Polluters' Big Ad Spending

Chevron Gets Ad-Jacked

Panasonic Unveils Eco Ad Campaign

Pranksters Hijack Chevron Corporate-PR Efforts

The Failure of Chevron's New 'We Agree' Ad Campaign

What We’re Up Against: BP Spending Reaches $126 Million

Media:

Climate as News, From Front Page to Home Page

Environmental Media Awards 2010: 'Avatar,' '30 Rock' Among Winners

New Guardian Sustainable Business web pages

Public Opinion:

Climate Change Literacy Won’t Be Enough

In Kansas, Climate Skeptics Embrace Cleaner Energy

Is Americans' Climate Ignorance a Tragedy or an Opportunity?

Is new global warming poll cause for despair?

Speaking green in a red state

Public Relations:

A rise in fake green PR?

Drink Responsibly: The Future of Water Sustainability and Corporate Brands

Ethical Corporation debate: How full product transparency combats greenwash

NASCAR adds ethanol to fuel for 2011

Optimize Your Sustainability: Where Brand Meets The Bottom Line

Stories Told by Gulf Residents Burst BP's PR Bubble

The absurdity of fake green rankings

Social Media:

Vote for the dirtiest opponent of clean energy this year

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, October 21, 2010

Speaking green in a red state

I had been toying with the idea of this blog post for a long time. For the life of me, I can’t understand why environmentalists are spending so much energy trying to convince people that climate change is happening when it’s far easier to get them to make climate-friendly choices through other means.

But most of what I would have said was already being done by the Climate and Energy Project (CEP) as told in this New York Times article: In Kansas, Climate Skeptics Embrace Cleaner Energy. The article by Leslie Kaufman is part of the Times’ series Beyond Fossil Fuels.

A year-long competition sponsored by CEP convinced Kansans to cut energy use by focusing on thrift, patriotism, spiritual conviction and economic prosperity rather than regulating greenhouse gases.

It’s a fascinating article. As CEP said in response on their blog:

And as the nation’s leaders continue to struggle to find modes and models for energy reform… Hellooooooo………

This is a topic I’d like to spend a lot more time on. What do you think? Can we make more progress on the environment by not talking about climate change?

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

A rise in fake green PR?

The kerfuffle over Chevron’s ad campaign and the accompanying spoof ad campaign (see my Inspired Economist post) reminded me that I hadn’t posted anything here about my first contribution to the Public Relations The Strategist. Titled Handling a Fake Twitter Account: @BPGlobalPR Leaves Lasting Impression on Crisis Communications, the article talks about the fake Twitter account that parodied BP’s communications response to the Gulf Oil Spill.

The Strategist article draws on the expertise of Shel Holtz and Kevin Dugan to talk about how BP could have better handled the crisis in the gulf and the rise of @BPGlobalPR on Twitter. With another oil company responding to another spoof communications plan from environmental activists, I thought it might be worth the read.

BPGlobalPR I was an early one of the 186,000+ followers of @BPGlobalPR on Twitter. How could I not be? In the midst of tragedy in the Gulf, with Jon Stewart enjoying an unfortunately timed vacation, it provided some much-needed comic relief.

But as I followed and chuckled, I was also thinking about what it signified for public relations as it is practiced today. An anonymous person sets up a Twitter account about one of the largest companies in the world that is in the midst of one of the largest crises of reputations in this century. Through biting satire, that anonymous (and free) account quickly amasses ten times the followers of that company (@BP_America), while generating tons of conversation online and off. What lessons should corporate communicators draw from this and this week’s Chevron episode?

Well, in case you are a corporate communicator struggling to understand the significance, the author of @BPGlobalPR spells it out for you in a press release announcing his name, Leroy Stick. Says Leroy:

I started @BPGlobalPR because the oil spill had been going on for almost a month and all BP had to offer were bullshit PR statements. No solutions, no urgency, no sincerity, no nothing. That's why I decided to relate to the public for them...Why has this caught on? I think it's because people can smell bullshit and sometimes laughing at it feels better than getting angry or depressed over it...The reason @BPGlobalPR continues to grow is because BP continues to spew their bullshit.

Then, Leroy tries to save PR from itself, especially those wondering what BP should do to save their brand from @BPGlobalPR. He writes:

Do you want to know what BP should do about me? Do you want to know what their PR strategy should be? They should fire everyone in their joke of a PR department, starting with all-star Anne Womack-Kolto and focus on actually fixing the problems at hand.

Then, Leroy moves from the specific (BP) to the general (all business):

So what is the point of all this? The point is, FORGET YOUR BRAND. You don't own it because it is literally nothing. You can spend all sorts of time and money trying to manufacture public opinion, but ultimately, that's up to the public, now isn't it?

You know the best way to get the public to respect your brand? Have a respectable brand. Offer a great, innovative product and make responsible, ethical business decisions. Lead the pack! Evolve!

The Rainforest Action Network, who along with the Yes Men and Amazon Watch were behind the spoof Chevron ad campaign, made a similar point in an email to the New York Times:

“When it comes to oil spills, climate change and human rights abuses, we need real action from Chevron,” said the e-mail. “Instead, the oil giant has prioritized a high-priced glossy advertising campaign that attempts to trick the American people into believing it is different than BP.”

While a little non-traditional in their approach (to say the least), this is actually sound advice. In our hyper-connected world, good communications can't overcome bad products or practices. A company can't afford a sliver of daylight between its actions and its communications because the truth is too easy to find. As the masthead of Adam Curry's blog says: "There are no secrets, only information we don't yet have." The only acceptable response is transparency.

Transparency and honesty are even more important for companies claiming to be green (anyone remember Beyond Petroleum?) In the Gort Cloud, author Richard Seireeni summarizes the book with a list of ten key observations for successfully building a green brand. Number one in the list is: Honesty isn't only the best policy...it's the only policy. In making this point, Seireeni repeatedly cites the importance of honesty and transparency in corporate communications.

Sierra Club executive director Carl Pope said that Clorox's decision to list all of the ingredients on the label of Green Works was a key factor behind their endorsement of the brand. "Sunshine is the best disinfectant," Pope said.

Are you on Twitter? Connect with me @nathanschock.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Monday, October 11, 2010

This week in Green Communications & PR

Every week I Tweet and share dozens of links to content on green advertising, media, communications and public relations. If you want those links in real time, just follow me on Twitter and/or subscribe to my shared items on Google Reader.

As you can see from the links this week, the two big stories were the release of the FTC guidelines on green marketing and the climate change ad from 10:10 featuring the exploding grade-school kids. Here they are:

Advertising:

Age of stupid – greens blow up school kids in ad to sell climate change

Audio from Green Marketing Masters Teleseminar “Avoiding Meaningless Messaging in Your Green Marketing”

Climate Group Regrets Shock Film Tactic (So Does Sony)

Eco-fascism jumps the shark: massive, epic fail!

Sony Drops Out of Climate Change Campaign After Exploding Kids Ad

The Arrival of the Federal Green Marketing Police

What the New Green Marketing Guidelines Really Mean

With friends like this, who needs enemies?

Media:

Inhabitat is Looking for Interns in New York City!

Technology Podcasting Pioneer Ads Green Tech Show

The Spill

Public Relations:

For Those Near, the Miserable Hum of Clean Energy

My takeaway from the Clinton Global Initiative: so, what’s new?